Monday, February 06, 2006
Attorney General Gonzales NOT Sworn In?
Why would he not be sworn in? Would that be so he could lie? Ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous... And Democrats demanding he be sworn in were overridden by the GOP. Imagine that. Ya think they've got anything to hide? Bastards. Stop putting these scurrilous creatures in office. They're embarrassing, hypocritical, dangerous and downright detestable. (So are the Democrats.)
Update 6: Gonzales Answers Tough Questions on Spying - Forbes.com
Update 6: Gonzales Answers Tough Questions on Spying - Forbes.com
Monday's hearing into the NSA program got off to a rocky start when Democrats protested that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales should be given a sworn oath before testifying.
Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the panel's senior Democrat, argued that Gonzales should be sworn in like any other witness. At the very least, Gonzales should be asked if he would volunteer to being sworn in, Leahy said.
"It's not up to him," said Specter, who was upheld by a quick party-line vote by the GOP-led committee.
Gonzales, who was not sworn in, told the committee he would voluntarily take the oath if the committee so desired. Either way, "my answers would be the same whether I was under oath or not," he said.
All contents of samiam.com are Copyright 2004, 2005, 2006 by S. A. "Sam" Moore unless otherwise attributed.
But Sam, didn't you know that Gonzales is above the law, like many of his cronies? That his answers would be the same...That his answers would be as evasive and disjointed regardles of the questions!
Post a Comment
<< Home